Brent Jones, SFMTA Director of Transit Responds to SaveMUNI Questions

SaveMUNI Questions Concerning Muni
Operations
Date: August 20, 2025
1) Muni Metro (MM) recently experienced a significant service breakdown during the AM
peak. Are you confident that you have the funding and staff capability to maintain MM in a state
of good repair ?
The service disruption you described was related to a software issue. The existing Automatic
Train Control System was rebooted and the system experienced residual delays as each train
was manually reconnected to the system.
As you indicated, modernizing Muni Metro’s train control is the most critical long-term
investment to improve Metro reliability, safety and service – making Metro fast, frequent,
reliable and safe. The good news is that work is already underway to do just that.
The Train Control Upgrade Project will replace and upgrade the existing Automatic Train

Control System in the Muni Metro subway with a modern, state-of-the-art Communications-
Based Train Control (CBTC) system that will extend citywide. Modern technology will also

give us more bandwidth and sophisticated capabilities to do even more to improve Muni
Metro.
We expect to begin installing the new train control system in 2026. Complete installation
systemwide is expected between 2032 and 2034. The SFMTA approved funding for this
project in our FY2025-2029 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). We are also pursuing regional,
state and federal grants to augment funding for TCUP and other maintenance and state of
good repair projects in the CIP.

While work is underway to update our Automatic Train Control System to Communications-
Based Train Control, our Muni Metro operations team is working diligently to ensure smooth

day-to-day operations of Muni Metro and reduce customer delays. Since July 2019, moderate
delays are down 66% and long delays are down 61%.
2) The Cable Cars offer tourists a unique San Francisco experience and provide a source of
revenue for Muni. But at least half the scheduled fleet of cable cars are on dwell at the four
terminals. What measures are being taken to improve the throughput of the cable car system ?
You are absolutely right. Within Operations, we’re actively working on our service
management strategies to decrease the time needed for cable cars turn around at the
terminals. We’re also getting ready to pilot a project to collect performance data, which we
currently don’t have.

This lack of performance data makes it difficult to pinpoint key issues, evaluate service
delivery or implement Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for operators.
3) Since the L Metro line has been reinstated, there are now five trunk lines in the tunnel. Do
you believe that the existing service provides enough capacity, and if not, what measures are you
undertaking ?
Currently, Metro ridership is at about 60% of pre-pandemic levels. As a result, we’ve been
able to run less Metro service and still meet demand. This has also reduced subway
congestion and delays. Muni Metro ridership has been growing each year since the
pandemic. Now we are starting to see overcrowding again, particularly on the N Judah.
In the immediate term, our service planning team regularly reviews crowding data. They
adjust to service frequencies to minimize crowding within existing operational resources.
In the medium to long term, the Muni Metro Capacity Study is focused on ensuring there will
be enough capacity for future riders. The Study has developed multiple scenarios of future
ridership forecasts and developed draft recommendations on what capital upgrades would be
needed to serve future demand. Stay tuned for more information about the Study’s draft
recommendations in September. The Study team is also available to join a SaveMUNI
meeting in September or October to share more and receive feedback.

4) When the fleet of articulated trolley coaches will be unable to use Potrero due to the
reconstruction, will other fleets be substituted on those lines now serviced out of that yard ?
Currently service planning is underway for the planning related to the reconstruction of
Potrero Yard. The Potrero Yard Modernization Project will replace our obsolete, century-old
bus yard with a modern, efficient bus maintenance and storage facility, equipped to serve the
SFMTA as it transitions to an all-electric fleet.
As we rebuild this facility, we hope to be able to accommodate some trolley coaches at other
Muni yards. We will also likely substitute some service with other types of vehicles. As these
plans evolve, we look forward to collaborating with our labor partners to bring them to fruition.
5) Muni initiated service changes earlier this year including truncating several lines. Are you
planning another round of service changes and reductions in the next twelve months ?
We know that Muni service is a lifeline for many. Quality public transportation is also key to
San Francisco achieving its climate, equity and economic recovery goals. So, we don’t take
making changes to Muni service lightly. Before we truncated service in June, we were facing
a $50 million budget shortfall in the current budget because parking revenue, transit revenue
and General Fund reimbursements are lower than we’d expected. This is largely a result of
the pandemic and its economic impact. As we were able to address the budget shortfall in
June with our service changes, we do not expect to make further service reductions in the
next year.

Looking ahead, we are navigating a $322 million budget deficit that starts next year in July
2026. To bridge this gap, we are constantly looking for ways to reduce spending and be even
more efficient.
To gather public input, identify solutions and prioritize options to address the funding gap, the
SFMTA and San Francisco Controller’s Office convened the Muni Funding Working Group in
September 2024. It considered several options in these categories to both decrease costs
and increase revenue:
• Efficiency Improvements: streamline systems and processes to further decrease
operating costs.
• Service Cuts: reduce service and/or subsidies to decrease operating costs.
• Revenue Enhancements: increase fees, revenue, or taxes to increase overall revenue.
• Service Enhancements: enhance services to win voter support for new revenue.
The guidance from the Muni Funding Working Group was to go big at the ballot and raise new
revenue instead of making cuts to transit service.
We also worked collaboratively with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, state
legislators and other Bay Area transit agencies on a new regional revenue measure for the
Nov. 2026 ballot.
6) In reference to headway management – hill and owl lines are now at 50 % adherence.
Reference was made to “re imagining hill lines” for the GSU in February. What does “re
imagining” mean ?
When we talk about “reimagining” our hill lines, we are referring to a comprehensive
reassessment of our travel times. Our Owl and Connector routes operate on a schedule, and
we are working to address issues related to vehicles running early.
The goal of this “reimagining” is to make a round of travel time adjustments. By doing so, we
aim to improve our overall on-time performance and bring the headway adherence back up
from the current 50%. This process is crucial for ensuring our service is reliable and meets
the needs of our riders.
7) Is Muni considering upgrading its headway management based on Seattle Metro’s
capability ? If not what remedy for headway management shortcomings is SFMTA pursuing ?
We spoke with King County about our experiences with headway management, and they
confirmed they’re facing similar challenges with technological limitations. However, as part of
our upcoming CAD/AVL (Computer-Aided Dispatch/Automatic Vehicle Location) upgrade, we
will receive a host of new features that will finally allow us to manage our terminals based on
headways.
This new system provides a suite of upgrades designed to enhance our service management.
It will give us the ability to calculate and manage terminal departures based on headway, not

just schedules. It will also provide dynamic headway management, which is a crucial
capability that was lacking in our previous system. The system will give us live data on vehicle
position, including whether a vehicle is early, late, or on time, and will provide an audible alert
when a vehicle is running early to help prevent bunching.
It will also include features for customer information, allowing us to determine the predicted
departure time from a terminal based on headway. Furthermore, the system will provide us
with real-time information about gaps and bunches in our service, and the capability to adjust
and manage route spacing dynamically. The new CAD/AVL bundle will give us the necessary
tools to proactively manage our fleet and improve on-time performance.
8) In reference to the stated Muni goal of financially efficient operations, has any study been
conducted to consider autonomous vehicle applications on Muni connector lines ?
Muni now has one of the most diverse transit fleets in the world and is also the cleanest
multimodal fleet in California. Our state-of-the-art fleet of electric trolley and hybrid buses
reduce or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions, helping San Francisco lead the way to a
sustainable future.
San Francisco is the second major city in the US where travelers who can afford them have
access to commercial autonomous vehicle (AV) ride-hail. That said, AV transit vehicles are
still in early stages of development and SFMTA has no plans to use autonomous

SAN FRANCISCO NOVEMBER 2022 BALLOT INITIATIVES

Several ballot initiatives related to transit and transportation issues are on the November 8, 2022, ballot in San Francisco.

Propositions I and J relate to road closures in Golden Gate Park, including JFK Drive, and the Great Highway. Proposition L relates to extending a sales tax to fund various transit and transportation projects in San Francisco.

SaveMUNI urges voters to vote YES on Proposition I and NO on Propositions J and L.

Proposition I

During the COVID pandemic, the City closed JFK Drive and other roads in Golden Gate Park to cars seven days a week, impacting seniors and disabled people and many low-income people and families who need to drive to Golden Gate Park. They are also considering closing the Great Highway 24/7. This would significantly impact thousands of commuters who regularly use the Great Highway.

Proposition I requires San Francisco to again allow private motor vehicles to use the roadways in Golden Gate Park as they were before the pandemic. JFK Drive and certain connector streets in Golden Gate Park would be open at all times except from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Sundays and legal holidays year-round, as well as on Saturdays in April through September. This is consistent with an Agreement reached by the City with seniors and disabled San Franciscans in 2007.

Proposition I would also require the City to allow motor vehicle use in both directions at all times on the Great Highway and would not allow the City to remove the Great Highway between Sloat and Skyline boulevards, a proposal currently under consideration by the City.

Vote YES on Proposition I

 

Proposition J

Proposition J is in opposition to Proposition I.

Proposition J would affirm by voter approval an Ordinance the San Francisco Board of Supervisors adopted in May 20222, keeping JFK Drive and other roads closed to private motor vehicles seven days a week.

Vote NO on Proposition J

 

Proposition L

San Francisco has a one-half cent sales tax to pay for transportation projects under a 30-year transportation spending plan approved by the voters in the November 4, 2003, election. The tax will expire on March 31, 2034.

Proposition L would continue the one-half cent sales tax into 2053, replacing the current transportation spending plan with a new 30-year plan that would continue into 2053. It involves borrowing $1.9 billion without setting priorities for projects or showing how the money spent will lead to better transit service.

SaveMUNI opposes Proposition L for several reasons: It is $3.2 billion regressive sales tax; it is a blank check for MUNI; it involves borrowing $1.9 billion; it hurts families, elderly, the infirm.

Vote NO on Proposition L

 

You can learn more about these measures here: https://sfelections.sfgov.org/measures

Press Release

May 9, 2022
For Immediate Release

SAVE MUNI OPPOSES MEASURE A

SaveMUNI voted to oppose Measure A, the $400 million Muni bond on the June ballot at our special meeting on May 2. We consider this bond measure far too vague. It fails to identify specific cost-effective transit improvements and prioritize them for funding.

SaveMUNI specifically objects to legal language that provides the MTA with what amounts to a blank check. Although several categories of projects are listed in the measure, the phrase, “not limited to”, opens bond spending to almost any project imaginable.

SaveMUNI also wondered whether looming cost overruns attributable to the Central Subway will somehow affect the use of bond proceeds. The SFMTA’s reluctance to say how they will pay for the $353 million of excess costs raises skepticism in our minds.

SaveMUNI understands that bond funding is costly. There are estimates that the total repayment for this bond issue could top $ 700 million. We believe that a pandemic time-out is warranted. A temporary halt on new bond measures, pending revision of the city’s strategic transit plan, should be put in place immediately.

Muni needs a comprehensive citywide transit strategy going forward. It is clear that the MTA has been failing to meets its own performance metrics for quite some time. Now with ridership returning, it is time to move toward full restoration of service that better meets the needs of all San Franciscans.

SaveMUNI is an independent, all volunteer, organization advocating for improved transit in San Francisco. In keeping with this role, we sponsored a debate between proponents and opponents of Measure A, and afterwards sent a set of follow up questions to each side for further discussion. After considering the available evidence, SaveMUNI could not support Measure A.

Contact:
Bob Feinbaum
President, SaveMUNI
bobf@att.net